Murder, mystery, and mayhem
I became a detective for a night so I could unpack why we're obsessed with solving murder mysteries
TRIGGER WARNING: The following article contains references to death and gore.
Shocked gasps mingled with laughter as the witnesses began to understand the scene in front of them. Naomi Piper, an obnoxious, award-winning actress, had been bludgeoned to death before their eyes. Lying sideways with blood pooling on her forehead, the once glamorous Naomi became nothing more than a vulnerable human that had endured a terrible fate. And what did onlookers do in this situation? They fed their morbid curiosity by photographing the scene and taking group photos with the body. One young lady even knelt beside Naomi and took a shot of her doing the peace sign for her Instagram.
The lead detective on the case encouraged the commotion and told onlookers to take as many photos as they could. “I need photographs for evidence,” he said, “I need as many photos as we can get and as many angles as possible.”
That’s when my journalistic instincts kicked in, and I shouldered my way through the crowd, dead set on snapping the best possible pictures. With my adrenaline at an all-time high, I snapped five photos in quick succession. I then looked at all the others that had gathered around the body and remembered something crucial: none of this was real.
I had fallen victim to the excitement of being the first to witness a crime scene and forgotten that this was all staged for my entertainment. There was something rather humorous in it. I had gathered to stare at an actress playing dead with a red jelly-like substance on her forehead. I was also snapping pictures as if I was about to put Jessica Fletcher to shame.
At the same time, there was also something quite eerie about it. Why was I taking pleasure in this fake murder? Why was I unable to look away from a situation that was so frightening? I was determined to find this out.
The glitz and glamour fades away as the outspoken Naomi can speak no more | Photo: Chloe Thomas - Evans
The glitz and glamour fades away as the outspoken Naomi can speak no more | Photo: Chloe Thomas - Evans
A nation captivated by crime
--> My quest to uncover our obsession with murder mysteries began when the TV show The Traitors aired its third season. On 1 January 2025, it premiered and took the UK by storm in the same way the last two seasons had. Everywhere I went, I heard whispers from those watching the new series. They spoke about who was going to win and who could work on looking less treacherous. As someone who had never viewed the show, I was intrigued. It seemed to be a TV show mimicking the childhood game wink murder with British icon Claudia Winkleman as host. I could see the appeal and it seemed like the rest of the British public could too; the finale episode brought in 7.4 million viewers which was 1.6 million more than the last season.
Yet, despite its success, our obsession with murder mysteries was evident long before the traitors were uncloaked. The murder mystery genre is believed to have started in the 19th century but it fully blossomed in the 1920s and 1930s with authors such as Agatha Christie and G.K. Chesterton. It has held our attention since then, with Nielsen Book Data reporting that crime/thriller has continued to dominate the audiobook market and maintain its place in podcasting. Both fictional and true crime seem to sell well with UK audiences and it looks like interest in the dark and gory is yet to disappear. In fact, with The Traitors becoming so successful this year, a new immersive experience called The Traitors Live Experience has been announced and is set to be unveiled in London’s Covent Garden in July 2025. The experience lets the general public show off their detective skills in their very own game of The Traitors. Participants can gather around a round table, collect gold for their prize pot, and pick the treacherous out from the faithful.
To understand why people might be interested in this experience and the idea of murder itself, I decided to attend my own murder mystery experience in The Angel Hotel in Cardiff. I purchased a ticket from a company called Murder 57 that promised to help me put my “sleuthing skills to the ultimate test.”
Studying to become the perfect sleuth
--> As soon as my confirmation email came through, I set to work. I knew the event was themed around an awards show, and I would need to dress the part. I chose the most appropriate outfit that I could find: a sparkly silver dress that looked far too fancy for everyday wear. Then, I focused on the most important part, which was knowing my place within the mystery.
The email told me I would become a lower-ranking detective surrounded by actors playing suspects or the head detective. I was tasked with helping the head detective review the evidence, interview the suspects, and find the murderer. But that’s all I knew. The rest would become clear at the event.
I decided to document my experience from start to finish so I could see whether I got caught up in the mystery. Before heading to the hotel, I pulled out a camera and started a video diary that began with my expectations of the event:
I’ll admit that I was pretty clueless. I’d never been to one of these events before and I had no idea how involved I’d be in the narrative. I’d recently spoken to a behavioural scientist and author called Coltan Scrivner, and he'd given me a rough idea of what to expect but even he couldn’t fully prepare me.
He told me murder mysteries expose us to uncomfortable situations that make us learn about ourselves and the situations portrayed in a mystery. “You learn not only about how potentially dangerous situations might unfold, but also how you would deal with them if it happened to you,” he said.
He added that people like to enjoy murder mysteries from a distance as this “keeps the learning benefits high, but the potential danger or consequences low.” This told me I should be prepared to see people indulge in the mystery while also find comfort in not being in a real-life scenario. I was interested to see how this might play out and how far people would go to engage with what they were seeing around them. Despite this, I knew that there was no use in guessing; I just had to see it for myself.
The game is afoot
--> On the night of the event, I entered the hotel and was led down a hallway and into a side room where I was seated with other guests. To my left was a young couple celebrating a birthday and to my right was Jeff Carter, a character I was yet to be introduced to. The couple told me they had been gifted the tickets to the event as they liked to solve murder mystery case files that they bought off Amazon. Poppy, the young woman in the couple, said she had loved murder mysteries since she was little and her Mum loved Agatha Christie. Her boyfriend, Joshua, shared her love for murder mysteries, and he came along as it was a birthday present given to him by Poppy’s mum.
Shortly after I began speaking to them both, Jeff Carter walked in alongside all the other characters that were involved in that evening’s mystery. He was joined by his timid starlet daughter Alison, a self-absorbed actress called Naomi, a womanizing actor called Pete, and a confident director called Christopher. He sat next to me as Naomi welcomed those in the room and told them that they were now part of an award ceremony for a modern adaptation of Hamlet.
--> Every character except for Jeff was up for an award, and they were waiting for their producer, Julian. Fortunately for those who didn’t want to wait, poor Julian was murdered before the event even started, causing a new character to be introduced: Detective Sargent John. John entered the scene determined to find the culprit, and he made every guest follow the case. Throughout the evening, he would display new evidence on two easels that stood on either side of the room (see one of the easels to your left), and we would have to try and figure out who the murderer was.
Those who couldn’t see the easels or preferred to use their phones were told to download the Murder 57 app and use exclusive codes to unlock content. They were also told that they could use the app to review the plot, make notes, and predict who the killer was.
I worked with those on my table and used the evidence to interrogate Jeff. Immediately, I got the impression that he was an overprotective father that treated Alison like she was fragile. He was very different from the rest of the characters, and he wanted us to recognise that. I decided he wasn’t a threat, so I turned my attention elsewhere.
The person who was causing the most chaos was Naomi, and I decided that something about her seemed off. Those on my table agreed, so we kept an eye on her as she moved between the tables. Yet, just when we were completely set on it being her, the unexpected happened. She fell to the floor with a freshly formed wound on her forehead. She had been murdered!
A closed case
--> In the face of what we just witnessed, we knew there was one of two conclusions. Either Naomi staged her death to escape prison, or someone killed Naomi so they could keep her quiet. I wasn’t so sure, but the game was coming to an end and I had to make a prediction. I decided to opt for the first conclusion as my heart was set on her being the murderer.
Weirdly enough, I was kind of right, but there was a third conclusion I hadn’t considered. Naomi had murdered Julian, but she hadn’t staged her own death. According to Detective Sergeant John, it was Jeff who had murdered Naomi as he wanted to eliminate the competition for his daughter. I was shocked. I had actually grown quite fond of Jeff.
Who knew? For someone who couldn’t quite understand the obsession with The Traitors I had now become so emotionally invested in my own little murder mystery game. But I wasn’t the only one invested. The dramatic reveal had evoked cheers from the winners and a chorus of “awwws” from the losers.
Catherine McPhillips was the overall winner of the game as she submitted an answer that was closest to the plot. She was awarded a box of chocolates and a certificate that called her a “super sleuth.” When I approached her to ask how she figured it out she said: “I saw he had a bit of violence in him and it just sort of struck me that it was Jeff.”
She was all smiles as she told me that she loved true crime but had never been to an event like this before. “It’s been really good,” she said. "I’ve really enjoyed it.”
Catherine beams at me with pride | Photo: Chloe Thomas – Evans
Catherine beams at me with pride | Photo: Chloe Thomas – Evans
Sitting at her table was a family friend that had been to events multiple times. A few of the actors told me this was quite common. In fact, actor Morgan Jermain, who played Alison, said she joined Murder 57 after going to an event. She said she enjoyed interacting with the other actors so much that she applied to work with the company and has been attending events ever since. Max Dickinson, who played Pete, said people continue to engage with murder mystery events because they enjoy having control over the narrative and watching it develop. “A lot of the time, you rewatch a film hoping for an ending that isn’t going to happen,” he said “Events like these are so interactive that you can make a decision on how it’s going to end.” He related this to the Traitors live show by saying, “The live show might be more interactive even in a sense of the votes being counted and the crowd saying ‘oh my god!’ It’s about getting people riled up and getting people heard.”
All this had me thinking that maybe I might find myself returning. While I don’t envision myself becoming an actor any time soon, I think I could envision myself taking on another murder mystery or perhaps joining those around the round table in London this July.
Thank you for reading. If you enjoyed this story and you'd like to see some more of my work, please follow my Instagram @chloe.the.journo


